Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 3, May 2015, Pages: 98-102

Nutritional Intervention- The Impact on Vitamins and Minerals Intake to Overweight and Obese Patients

Mihaela Posea1, 2, *, Andreea Dragomir2, 3, Emilia Rusu1, 2, Raluca Nan¹, ², Ramona Dragut1, 2, Florentina Radu1, 2, Ileana Teodoru1, 2, Gabriela Radulian1, 2

1National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases "N. C. Paulescu", Bucharest, Romania

2University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania

3Clinic of Nutrition "Diet4life", Bucharest, Romania

Email address:

(M. Posea)

To cite this article:

Mihaela Posea, Andreea Dragomir, Emilia Rusu, Raluca Nan, Ramona Dragut, Florentina Radu, Ileana Teodoru, Gabriela Radulian. Nutritional Intervention- The Impact on Vitamins and Minerals Intake to Overweight and Obese Patients. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, pp. 98-102. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20150303.13


Abstract: Background and Aims- To evaluate the impact of nutritional intervention on vitamins and minerals from intake food and anthropometric parameters at overweight and obese patients. Material and methods- To a sample of 40 overweight and obese patients we evaluated the nutritional content of food intake (kilocalories, macro and micronutrients) before and after a low caloric diet. We also measured anthropometric parameters like weight, body mass index, body fat, percent of body fat, abdominal circumference and arterial tension. Results- After the nutritional intervention, overweight and obese patients had significantly lower level of intake carbohydrates (P=.018), lipids (P=.002), B1 vitamin (P<.001), B3 vitamin (P=.02) and E vitamin (P=.016). There is a significantly increased level of proteins (P<.001). Regarding the minerals, we found that the intake levels of following‘s decreased: sodium (P<.001), magnesium (P=.006), zinc (P=.035), copper (P=.002), manganese (P<.001). Phosphorus is the only mineral of which the intake level increased significantly (P<.001). All the anthropometric parameters decreased significantly: weight (P<.001), body mass index (P<.001), body fat (P<.001), percent of body fat (P<.001), abdominal circumference (P<0.001), systolic arterial tension (P<.001), diastolic arterial tension (P=.002). Conclusions- All our overweight and obese patients had imbalanced intake of vitamins and minerals both before and after intervention. There is a significant improved on anthropometric measures after nutritional intervention. We need to pay more attention to food quality and quantity during low caloric diet, thus to assure the recommended daily intake for vitamins and minerals.

Keywords: Overweight, Obese, Intake Food, Vitamins, Minerals, Anthropometric Measures


1. Introduction

According to World Health Organization, in 2014, more than 1.9 billion adults, 18 years and older, were overweight. Of these over 600 million were obese [1]. Obesity is a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (mainly stroke and heart disease), cancer (endometrial, breast, colon), pulmonary diseases, osteoporosis, and periodontal diseases. It has numerous consequences on lipid, glucose and protein metabolism with hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia and hyperuricemia. Obesity appears as a consequence of imbalance between energy intake (by food) and consumed energy (mainly by physical activities and resting metabolic rate). Sedentary life and unhealthy meals, richer in energy-dense foods (high-fat, high sugar, high-salt, micronutrient poor ) are the main problem of the contemporary world.

Except the vitamin D, that is synthesized in the human body, in the cutaneous tissue, in response to sunlight exposure [2], all the other vitamins are provided by food intake. There are two types of vitamins- one’s that are soluble in fat, like vitamins A, D,E. and K and other’s that are soluble in water- like vitamins B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, folic acid. Excess of fat-soluble vitamins cannot be eliminated so these vitamins will be stored in human body if the intake level is high and it can lead to symptoms and diseases. The water soluble vitamins are eliminated through kidney or liver and the risk of intoxication is lower and the symptoms occur rarely.

Minerals represent only 4-5 % of body weight but they are very important by participating to all vital functions [3].

The role of many vitamins is to act as coenzymes or as part of enzymes responsible for essential chemical reactions, e.g., the synthesis of fat and neurotransmitters. A high level of vitamins may also affect the degradation of neurotransmitters and one-carbon metabolism. Therefore, the excess of vitamins may trigger obesity through multiple ways, including increasing fat synthesis, causing insulin resistance and disturbing neurotransmitter metabolism [4].

A closer look to the dietary habits and to the nutritional content of the food intake is necessary considering the increasing number of overweight and obese people.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of nutritional intervention on intake of vitamins and minerals from food and effects of dieting on anthropometric parameters among overweight and obese patients Also we assessed the resting metabolic rate. Resting metabolic rate (RMR) is the largest component of the daily energy expenditure in most humans and, therefore, any increases in RMR in response to exercise interventions are potentially of great importance. The Harris-Benedict equations (1, 2) are only approximating the basal metabolic rate. We used an indirect calorimeter to measure the metabolic rate. We estimated the energy consumed through physical activities ( all of our patients were sedentary) and we calculated the total energy intake needed to lose weight.

Men: RMR = 665 + (13.75 x weight in kg) + (5 x height in cm) – (6.78 x age in years)           (1)

Women: RMR = 655 + (9.56 x weight in kg) + (1.85 x height in cm) – (4.68 x age in years)        (2)

In this way we have the opportunity to change the unhealthy eating behaviors in order to reach to a normal weight. Knowing exactly what they eat, how many kilocalories, vitamins and mineral and calculating the energy needed for a healthy diet (using resting metabolic rate) we can modify the content of the meals and develop a well-balanced meal’s program. Reaching and maintaining a normal weight, the overweight and obese patients have the possibility to prevent the risks associated with obesity.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Materials

We evaluated 40 subjects-overweight and obese patients. They were recruited from a private practice where they addressed for a nutritional intervention to control their body weight. We define a person overweight if her body mass index (BMI) defined as a person's weight in kilograms divided by the square of his height in meters (kg/m2) is between 25 and 30kg/m2 and the patient is obese if he had the BMI greater than 30 kg/m2.

We collected data regarding age, gender, height, abdominal circumference, weight, percent of body fat, resting metabolic rate. All this data were collected twice- at the beginning of the nutritional intervention and after 6 months.

Waist circumference (WC) was measured at the umbilical level using an unscratched tape meter, without any pressure to body surface and measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm.

We recorded the body weight and percent of body fat using a body composition analyzer that performed whole body and segmental measurements, with three frequency ranges and eight touch electrodes (IOI 353 Body Composition Analyzer, Jawon Medical, Korea).

Resting metabolic rate was performed after eight hours fasting with an indirect calorimeter that uses the dilution technique for accurate measurements (Fitmate Pro, Cosmed, Italy). Based on resting metabolic rate we calculate the total calorie intake needed to lose weight.

We also evaluated the total energy intake. Using a 7-day food self record questionnaire, we assessed in all the patients the intake of macro and micronutrients, including energy (total kilocalories), carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, cholesterol, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, folic acid, and minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, and sodium. All these data were reported as a percent of dietary reference intake using US National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference release 24 [5]. We analyzed the frequency of a low intake of vitamins and minerals among overweight and obese patients and we also evaluated the mean sodium intake reported as mg/day and this level was only provided by food because the patients didn’t self-confessed the salt add-on.

All the patients were informed about a healthy diet- having 3 meal/day and 2 snacks, with increasing the consumption of fruits, vegetables and avoiding the high-energy dense food, We had weekly meetings in the first two months and twice a month meetings in the following 4 months. We encouraged increasing the level of physical activities for at least 30 minute /day.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

For collection, analysis and interpretation of results we used the Microsoft Excel and Statistica var 4.3 software. For comparison of the means and frequencies we used Student and CHI² tests for independent samples. To confirm the null hypothesis we set a p >0.05. For p<0.05 the null hypothesis is disproven.

3. Results

The study included 40 overweight and obese patients.  There were more women (28 patients-70%) than men (12 patients-30%). After the nutritional intervention all the anthropometric parameters improved significantly, as shown in Figure 1. Regarding the values of arterial tension, both systolic (P<.001) and diastolic (P=.002) improved significantly, as well as the values of plasma total cholesterol which has reached normal limits (from 231.42 mg/dl to 181.33 mg/dl, P=.015). The plasma values for iron, calcium, HDL cholesterol, glucose and thyroid stimulating hormone have not changed significantly (table 1).

Table 1. Changes in arterial tension and biochemical parameters during nutritional intervention.

Variables Before After P
Systolic Arterial Tension (mmHg) 133.50±13.28 120.92±12.60↓ <.001
Diastolic Arterial Tension (mmHg) 79.13±8.19 73.63±8.80↓ .002
Plasma iron (ug/dl) 102.18±13.67 95.91±21.82 .41
Plasma calcium (mg/dl) 9.46±0.45 9.32±0.58 .26
Plasma total cholesterol (mg/dl) 231.42±55.71 181.33±27.12↓ .015
Plasma HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 49.50±13.72 52.20±16.29 .59
Plasma glucose (mg/dl) 89.75±15.09 89.42±16.28 .89
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (uUi/ml) 1.72±1.08 1.53±0.93 .61

Figure 1. Significant changes on anthropometric measures after nutritional intervention (W-weight, BMI-body mass index, PBF-percent of body fat, AC-abdominal circumference).

We evaluated the daily food intake in kilocalories and established the macronutrients content. Also, we measured resting metabolic rate and we considered that a patient had a slow resting metabolic rate (Slow RMR) if the ratio RMR measured with indirect calorimetry/ RMR estimate by Harris-Benedict equation x 100 is less than 86 %, a normal RMR if that ratio is 86-114% and a rapid RMR if the ratio is above 114% (based on the limits recommended by Fitmate Pro RMR measuring device). Based on this classification, resting metabolic rate is normal, both before and after intervention.

The normal intake of carbohydrates we considered to be from 55 to 60 % of total energy intake; the normal range for proteins is 15-20 % and for lipids is 25 to 30 % of total energy intake. With this limits, we found that the majority of intake energy is derived from carbohydrates. After the intervention the contribution of carbohydrates (P=.018) and lipids (P=.002) to total energy intake decreased significantly and increased the contribution of proteins (P<.001) (table 2).

We evaluated the mean dietary intake of vitamins as a percent of the Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) and we consider that a mean intake between 90% and 110% is normal. Except for D and E vitamins, all the other vitamins were above the recommended daily level at the beginning of the nutritional intervention. The intake level of B1 vitamin (P<.001), B3 vitamin (P=.02) and E vitamin (P=.016) have decreased. The intake of A, B2, B5, B6, B12 and C vitamins has not changed significantly, as shown in Table 3.

Table 2. Resting Metabolic Rate and macronutrients content of food intake ( RMRm- resting metabolic rate measured, RMRc- resting metabolic rate calculated with Harris Benedict formula).

Variables Before After P
Food Intake (kilocalories) 1983.59±632.42 1087.00±323.8↓ <.001
RMRm (kilocalories) 1655.10±398.44 1527.29±390.53↓ .003
RMRm/RMRc x 100 92.73±13.52 92.88±18.11 .96
Carbohydrates (%) 40.65±7.04 34.95±11.22↓ .018
Proteins (%) 20.16±3.06 32.73±9.58↑ <.001
Lipids (%) 37.17±5.89 31.48±6.49↓ .002

Table 3. Changes in vitamins intake level during nutritional intervention.

Variables Before After P
Folic acid (%) 100.91±56.63 82.77±54.6 .24
A vitamin (%) 259.82±180.82 316.68±204.98 .30
B1 vitamin (%) 149.18±53.089 83.45±30.59↓ <.001
B2 vitamin (%) 189.14±75.29 146.95±72.66 .12
B3 vitamin (%) 203.77±57.27 168.27±58.07↓ .02
B5 vitamin (%) 131.32±56.45 109.91±53.93 .22
B6 Vitamin (%) 185.50±82.22 169.82±134.34 .64
B12 vitamin (%) 364.82±175.88 328.41±234.99 .60
C vitamin (%) 145.91±95.70 211.59±154.84 .08
D vitamin (%) 30.18±19.51 24.23±33.27 .048
E vitamin (%) 62.45±29.53 43.41±24.57↓ .016

We are presenting in the following lines the evolution of the frequencies of the cases with below/normal or above limits of vitamins. The frequencies of the cases with folic acid intake below the recommended daily limits increased significantly (P=.03) after nutritional intervention and the frequencies of the cases with intake level normally decreased (P=.02) after the intervention. During nutritional intervention, there are significant less patients (P=.04) with an intake level of A vitamin below normal amounts. The number of the patients that eat A vitamin excessively or normally does not change significantly. Regarding the level of B1 vitamin, the frequencies of the cases with excessive intake decreased significantly (P<.001) and the frequencies of the cases with deficient intake have increased after the intervention (P=.002). There are more patients that have an intake level of B2 vitamin below the RDI (P=.04) after the nutritional intervention. There are no significant changes regarding the number of the cases that meet the RDI or that have an increased intake level of C vitamin, but there are significant less patients (P=.018) that eat below the RDI. The frequency of the patients with below RDI of E vitamin have increased (P=.04) and there are no changes about the normal/above level of E vitamin. The frequencies of the cases with intake level below, normal or above the RDI of B3, B5, B6, B12 and D vitamins didn’t change significantly after the nutritional intervention.

The mean intake of minerals has changed in this way: the mean intake level of sodium (P<001), magnesium (P=.001), zinc (P=.035), copper (P=.002) and manganese (P<.001) decreased; the levels of calcium, iron and selenium didn’t changed significantly but the mean intake of phosphorus has increased (P<.001) (table 4).

Table 4. Changes in minerals intake level during nutritional intervention.

Variables Before After P
Sodium (mg/day) 3144.32 ±1036.34 2077.09±924.54↓ <.001
Calcium (%) 64.91±31.08 53.68±19.98 .10
Magnesium (%) 81.64±37.49 58.91±17.84↓ .006
Phosphorus (%) 87.23±43.48 151.50±56.19↑ <.001
Iron (%) 146.55±100.31 112.18±80.53 .15
Zinc (%) 129.27±49.14 98.14±38.86↓ .035
Copper (%) 139.00±47.27 98.18±37.49↓ .002
Manganese (%) 147.09±56.91 93.09±44.53↓ <.001
Selenium (%) 234.05±83.19 205.73±97.73 .18

Regarding the magnesium intake, after the intervention there is no patient that eat more magnesium that RDI (P=.02); also, the frequency of the patients with insufficient intake increased significantly (P=.001). The number of cases with excessive intake of phosphorus increased significantly (P<.001) and there are less patients that eat a normal (P=.05) or below level (P<.001). The frequency of patients with excessive intake of copper decreased (P=.004) and there are significantly more cases that eat below recommended intake level (P=.026). Regarding the manganese, there are significantly less patients that eat more than recommended daily level (P=.004) and the number of cases with insufficient intake level increased after the nutritional intervention (P=.016). There are no significant changes regarding the frequency of below, normal or above intake levels of sodium, calcium, iron, zinc and selenium.

4. Discussions

As we expected, the anthropometric measures improved significantly (body weight, body mass index, body fat and percent of body fat, abdominal circumference) as well as arterial tension and plasma level for total cholesterol. All this parameters are known to be risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. We didn’t found any significant improvement for plasma HDL cholesterol which is best recognized for its ability to shuttle excess cholesterol from peripheral tissues to the liver for excretion in the process of reverse cholesterol transport, likely contributing to the well-known inverse relationship between HDL-cholesterol and cardiovascular diseases [6]. Plasma level of glucose, in our study, didn’t change significantly but it was in normal range.

The total energy intake decreased significantly in our study but it is well known that obese individuals underreport food intake by 20-40% when completing food records [7]. The participants were encouraged to write down all that they eat and drink in order to help them to change their habits.

We found that the normal targeted percentage of energy derived from carbohydrates (55-60%), proteins (15-20 %) and fat (25-30%) were not met- there were less carbs (40.65±7.04 %), normal proteins (20.16±3.06 %) and high lipids (37.17±5.89 %) at baseline, showing that the weight problems are not due to a high carbohydrate diet. At the end of the study the percentages changed in this way- carbohydrates decreased even more (34.95±11.22 %), proteins increased (32.73±9.58%) and lipids almost reached a normal range (31.48±6.49%). In a large study that included 811 overweight and obese patients (Pounds Lost Study) that compared the effects of diets with different macronutrient composition on weight loss and resting energy expenditure (REE or RMR) Lilian de Jonge et all showed that both body weight and REE decreased by 6 months, but were unaffected by diet composition [8]. Another study that compared the weight–loss diets with different composition of fats, proteins and carbohydrates showed that reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize [9].

We also found an unbalanced diet regarding the intake of vitamins and minerals in overweight and obese patients both before and after nutritional intervention. Except vitamin D (which can be produced by the body), all other vitamins must be acquired through a healthy diet. The amounts of B1 vitamin from diet decreased below the recommended daily doses. The intake levels of B3 vitamin have decreased but it remained above normal ranges. There are some minerals of which level have decreased but maintaining in normal range, such as zinc, copper and manganese. Magnesium is the only mineral that is found in small amounts in the diet of patients at the end of the study. Calcium is the only mineral that has no significant changes during the intervention, remaining below the RDI. The mean intake of sodium decreased significantly but it remained above the recommended limits. The amount of sodium was assessed only by the content of the food because the patients didn’t self-confessed the salt add-on. In a study that included 240 participants with metabolic syndrome enrolled in a dietary intervention trial to lose weight and improve dietary quality, Wang J et al also examined patterns and amount of daily sodium intake and found that high percentage of participants consumed excess sodium even after a dietary intervention [10].

The strengths of the paper is that few researches used a a self recorded food journal to establish the total amount of dietary vitamins and minerals. We included all this data in a computer software that use US National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference release 24. Most of the studies evaluate the vitamins and minerals consumed using food groups to specific population groups, like university students, pregnant women, etc not to overweight and obese patients [11].

The weakness of the method is that the patients self confessed what they eat but they had the motivation to do that (they pay for the nutritional intervention and they followed the instructions in order to reach a normal weight). We didn’t take into account the influence of the age to different patterns of nutrition.

Further studies are needed to evaluate this nutritional program supported by changing several parameters: number of participants, age, sex, duration of intervention.

Because the study group included more women than men and due to the limited number of patients this trial cannot be representative for general population.

5. Conclusions

None of our patients achieved the recommended daily intake for vitamins and minerals, neither before nor after the nutritional intervention. We obtained an improvement of all anthropometric parameters. The sodium intake decreased nearly the recommended ranges. We need to promote healthy lifestyle changes to prevent the risks associated with obesity. Given that the present study was a short-term study, novel approaches are needed to examine ways of encouraging long-term adherence to dietary advice before conclusions can be drawn with regard to the long-term importance of macronutrient and micronutrient composition.


References

  1. World Health Organization. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/
  2. Radulian G, Rusu E. Vitamins. In:Nutrition and Dental Health. Radulian G. Carol Davila, Bucharest, 2008. 95-96 p.
  3. Radulian G, Rusu E. Minerals. In:Nutrition and Dental Health. Radulian G. Carol Davila, Bucharest, 2008. 148 p.
  4. Zhou SS, Zhou Y. Excess vitamin intake: An unrecognized risk factor for obesity. World J Diabetes, .Feb 15, 2014; 5(1): 1–13. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i1.1.
  5. United State Department of Agriculture. SR24-HomePage. Retrieved from: http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/ docs.htm ? docid=22808.
  6. Gordon S, Davidson S, Urbina E, Dolan L, Heink A, Zang H,et al. The effects of type 2 diabetes on lipoprotein composition and arterial stiffness in male youth. Diabetes. 2013: 62(8):2958-2967.
  7. Vansant G, Hulens M. The assessment of dietary habits in obese women: influence of eating behavior patterns. Eat Disord. 2006 Mar-Apr; 14 (2):121-9. PMID: 16777809.
  8. De Jonge L,Bray G,Smith S, Ryan D, De Souza R,Loria C et al. Effect of Diet Composition and Weight Loss on Resting Energy Expenditure in the POUNDS LOST Study. Obesity (Silver Spring). Dec 2012; 20(12): 2384–2389. doi:10.1038/oby.2012.127
  9. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, Smith SR, Ryan DH, Anton SD et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26; 360(9):859-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804748
  10. Wang J, Olendzki B, Wedick N, Persuitte G, Culver A, Li W et al. Challenges in sodium intake reduction and meal consumption patterns among participants with metabolic syndrome in a dietary trial.Nutrition Journal 2013, 12:163. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-163
  11. Agüero S, García S, Gaete M. Aporte de vitaminas y minerales por grupo de alimentos en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(3):830-838

Article Tools
  Abstract
  PDF(220K)
Follow on us
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931